DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6599>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6599 Fork in javadoc is not needed if you added a security manager ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-21 00:16 ------- Perhaps I misspoke. I am currently in the process of moving our build from in-house tools to Ant. The in-house tools used this solution -- I have not patched the javadoc task source. I tend to agree that it is a symptom of a bigger problem. I don't think the System.exit issue would only arise from javadoc -- it is just the most obvious. Due to the lack of a patch to diff, do you still want example code uploaded? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
