Hi, Would you mind making all those icky protected variables private :)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The goal of this patch is to allow a different XML processor > to be plugged in and used. > > The current processor has a number of limitations ( lack of > namespace support, etc ) - but the main benefit for this > patch is that it allows new ideas to be used without > affecting the whole thing. > > How it works: > - the current parser is used as default. > > - a user can set a system property or just include an > alternative xml processor in the classpath, and this > will be detected and loaded instead of the default. > ( same pattern as in jaxp, common-logging, etc to > find a Helper implementation ) > > - all helpers are supposed to support the original > behavior and be backward compatible. Of course, the user > may ignore this and use a completely different model, > or have the behavior customized based on some namespace, > etc. > > Costin -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------- "When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries of life disappear and life stands explained." -Mark Twain ------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
