On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:54, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I don't think the ProjectHelper changes will cause any problems.
> > The only one
> > who has ever expressed doubts over that style is Conor and I
> > believe he has
> > changed his mind.
>
> Not sure to what you are referring. Can you explain?

Costin has proposed changes to ProjectHelper that are mostly equivelent to 
the ProjectBuilder abstraction I proposed. Basically a mechanism to  to have 
alternative strategys to build project objects. At one stage you objected to 
ProjectBuilder abstraction back ages ago. Though from your comments recently 
I don't think your objections still hold ?

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

*------------------------------------------------*
| You can't wake a person who is pretending      |
|       to be asleep. -Navajo Proverb.           |
*------------------------------------------------*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to