----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > It may likely get veto'd by ant-dev.
>
> It has already been vetoed, time and again and almost certainly will be
again.

Just for a quick re-hash, what is the (one sentence, maybe) strongest
argument against such a change?

Does anyone have quick pointers to an archive thread that details the
reasons not to do such a thing?

Thanks,
    Erik



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to