DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6931>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6931

ejbjar/weblogic classpath element ignored

           Summary: ejbjar/weblogic classpath element ignored
           Product: Ant
           Version: 1.4.1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Minor
          Priority: Other
         Component: Optional Tasks
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


In WebLogic 6.1, you get warnings about the home and remote and other classes 
appearing on the system CLASSPATH if put those classes in the wlclasspath--
that's well documented. 

Supposedly one should be able to specify a separate <classpath> element 
alongside <wlclasspath> that supplies these classes and just put the weblogic 
JAR files in wlclasspath and eliminate these errors, but my experience has been 
that it is ignored--you have a choice of getting the warnings or of it not 
working at all. Consulting the source bears this out: there is no place that 
the -classpath argument to weblogic.ejbc is added to the javaTask object. The 
wlclasspath eventually ends up as the SYSTEM classpath, as intended:

            javaTask.setFork(true);
            if (classpath != null) {
                javaTask.setClasspath(classpath);
            }

but the generic classpath does not have a corresponding

            javaTask.createArg().setValue("-classpath");
            javaTask.createArg().setLine(classpath);

to add the argument to weblogic.ejbc. Also, it seems classpath is overwritten 
by the value of wlClasspath, so even if that did happen, you'd get the system 
classpath instead of the <classpath> path value.

--kd

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to