On Thursday 21 March 2002 13:04 pm, Adam Murdoch wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Diane Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --- Adam Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You're not the only one. In myrmidon, we changed if and unless to test > > > the property value against true/false/yes/no (with unset still > > > evaluating to false). > > > > And I assume set (to anything) will evaluate to true? > > Here's how the test gets evaluated: > > property not set => false > property set to 'false' => false > property set to anything other than 'false' => true
That's how it SHOULD get evaluated, IMO, but that's not how it actually works (at least, in Ant 1.4.1). It goes like this: > property not set => false > property set to anything => true Then again, maybe it only responds to the word 'false', and not 'off' or 'no', as most other flags do? ----- stephan Generic Universal Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 "I ain't gen'rally given to physicality of that nature but it saves a lot of arguing." -- Nanny Ogg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
