From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, stephan beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i think technically 'implementation' is the better word, but from a > > user perspective i would find 'compiler' more appropriate, i > > think. > > Probably yes. I also want to add the same features to <rmic> and > Steve has similar code in <jspc> - in both cases compiler would work > as well. > > implementation could be applied to other future facade tasks as well, > though. >
"implementation" does not say much of anything. And "compilerImplementation" is really too long. So I like "compiler". Another reason is that the value of the attribute is not an implementation (e.i., the name of a class implemting some compiler) what it is is the name of a compiler, from a list of known compilers. Hence I think compiler is much more accurate. Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
