On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 21:56, Adam Murdoch wrote:
> Absolutely. I actually meant we should split TypeManager into 2
> interfaces, and split RoleManager into 2 interfaces, but keep
> DefaultTypeManager and DefaultRoleManager as they are.
Ahh I c what you mean. One little thing though. You seem to have it backwards
- ie Your Registry had the factory method and your Manager had the register
method. Shouldn't the register method be part of registry and factory method
be part of the Manager ? ;)
> So, something like this:
>
> TypeManager gets split into:
>
> interface TypeRegistry
> {
> TypeFactory getFactory( roleName );
> }
>
> interface TypeManager
> {
> void registerType( roleName, typeName, typeFactory );
> }
>
> And RoleManager gets split into:
>
> interface RoleRegistry
> {
> RoleInfo getRole...( ... );
> }
>
> interface RoleManager
> {
> void registerRole( roleInfo )
> }
>
>
> Adam
--
Cheers,
Pete
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it.
Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it.
-- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept. 1982
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
