No, but there are lots of "extends Task" out there, so Adam was saying you
can't simply make Task an interface. And I believe Steve brought up the
fact that there are JLS issues with backwards compatibility if we make Task
"implement Taskable" and move the declaration of execute() to Taskable.
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "stephan beal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Adam Murdoch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Exporting a Project Instance
> On Sunday 24 March 2002 00:20 am, Adam Murdoch wrote:
> > Don't forget the huge number of tasks that aren't part of the Ant source
> > tree. Task is very much part of Ant's public API. Which means we can't
> > just change Task from class to interface.
>
> They interact with the Task API, not the Task objects, normally. i don't
> suspect you'll see much of this:
>
> Task foo = new Task();
>
>
>
> ----- stephan
> Generic Universal Computer Guy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de
> Office: +49 (89) 552 92 862 Handy: +49 (179) 211 97 67
> Student: "Master, you must teach me the way of liberation!"
> Master: "Tell me who it is that binds you."
> Student: "No one binds me!"
> Master: "Then why do you seek liberation?"
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
