On Sunday 24 March 2002 18:23 pm, you wrote: > Your changes had better be backwards compatible with the existing <cvs> > task - and support the 'command' attribute too - sounds like you have this > covered.
Yup, i've just re-done the internal handling of command='...' to make it use <commandline>. > Otherwise you're wasting your time! :) I think if you need > addConfiguredX you're probably doing something funky and unnecessary, but > I'll hold off comment until I see the code. hehehe. i originally didn't want to use addConfiguredX(), but the handling of command='...' basically required it (if i wanted complete consistency, anyway). i've gotta run some tests, add some API docs, etc., and then i'll send it up (and then it's to work on test cases). ----- stephan Generic Universal Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 Student: "Master, you must teach me the way of liberation!" Master: "Tell me who it is that binds you." Student: "No one binds me!" Master: "Then why do you seek liberation?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
