On Monday 25 March 2002 09:10 am, Diane Holt wrote: > As I've said before, I think this format is really out-of-character for > Ant -- and if I came across it in a build file, I'd think it was a > mistake, since there's nothing to indicate what it's even doing.
Just as there's nothing to indicate that <target if='foo'> depends on 'if' having ANY value (as opposed to boolean true)... Unless You Read The Docs. We can't expect any given feature to be truly intuitive (though i find cdata-as-commands as intuitive as <echo>this is an echo</echo>, which is technically Exactly the same construct as <cvs>up -r 1.1 build.xml</cvs>). > I realize you've already taken the time to write a bunch of code to deal > with this, but I'm sure we've all at some point or other written code that ... In any case, _my_ copy of the tree will have this feature, because _i_ use it :). (Erik, this is a great example of why i prefer to subclass - otherwise i'd have to patch the tree every time i updated ant, and that would be no fun.) ----- stephan Generic Unix Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 "...control is a degree of inhibition, and a system which is perfectly inhibited is completely frozen." -- Alan W. Watts -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
