DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7482>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7482 PatternSet.setIncludes() does not SET includes, but appends them to a list [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 13:39 ------- Now do you understand why I feel uncomfortable re-using "tasks" internally? :) I'm marking this as WONTFIX as its by design. Its for the case where you have a nested <include> and use the 'includes' attribute - so it *must* be this way. Refactor! But more importantly, perhaps discuss your needs on ant-user or ant-dev on what you're doing that can't already be done. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
