Peter Donald wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:53, Conor MacNeill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * @since Ant 1.1 + *
+1
Can we standardize on this format? I don't think putting in the CVS version of the file is particularly useful and may just be confusing.
Thoughts?
@since and @version are different things. I would keep @version containing a CVS version string because it makes it easier for users to report errors. However @since is also useful I assume. Though I don't think I would use it - it may be useful when doing documentation ala XDoclet?
I'm not talking about the @version tag but this sort of usage * @since 1.102, Ant 1.5
and
* @since 1.1
which is in a lot of files at the moment.
Actually I don't really like having CVS version ids in @version either since it complicates CVS merges somewhat but that is probably a losing battle :-)
Conor
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
