> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > We could add more failing tests in there, the aim being to have all those > tests passing by ant 1.5 ship date. > > Seem like a good tactic? >
+1 Indeed, I like the approach of adding the testcase in first, then fixing the code. I did this recently with a <depend> bug but held off checking in any of it until the bug was fixed. This approach will allow these two roles to be independant which would be good. The only caution would be to ensure it doesn't become a hiding place for "broken windows". Probably not much of a concern with the level of scrutiny Ant gets. Conor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
