On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I would prefer was that you had answered my question when I > asked it initially
Then I must have missed that question, sorry. I vaguely recall that you talked about depending on stuff from excalibur, and I didn't think that would be different from depending on stuff from BCEL. > rather than waiting till I already done work and committed That > would have been a little more considerate. I don't expect you to revert any of the work you've done. All that I wanted to say is that *I* won't do what your warning expects me to do if I see a reason to change the class - and I'd really prefer if you'd remove the WARNING completely. Why are you duplicating the code instead of making it a binary dependency on the appropriate excalibur part? Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
