On 29 Apr 2002, Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lun 29/04/2002 � 12:58, Stefan Bodewig a �crit :
>> (2) replacing
>>
>> if [...] then
>> command
>> fi
>>
>> with [...] && command
>>
>> While (2) is a question of style (and I prefer ours, YMMV),
>
> Well, (2) is mostly to shrunk the size of these ifs,
No strong feelings here, I still prefer indentation to show what's
going on, that's all.
>> I'm totally opposed to removing the AIX hack as it would break
>> backwards compatibilty. People don't need to set JAVACMD on AIX
>> right now.
>
> Well, as you've wrote it's a hack and I really don't think we should
> support all non-standard jvm layouts in the main script (plus it's a
> hellhole when you have many application scripts to support like we
> do at jpackege).
>From a jpackage point of view, you are right. From an Ant point of
view, backwards compatibility forces us to keep the hack now and for
the foreseeable future.
> so this hack could be shared with tomcat and other java apps.
fine with me.
> If core ant jars (i.e the jaxp parser) are loaded in the classpath
> after the local classpath
Nit 1: Ant's script puts the jar from ANT_HOME/lib to the front.
> and the local classpath contains saxon jars the style task will bomb
> because it will detect the �lfred parser first, and this parser is
> not supported.
Nit 2: �lfred is supported in 1.5.
;-)
Cheers
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
