On Mon, 06 May 2002, Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - For consistency, wouldn't <selectset> be better than <select>? > > I'm happy to call it whatever people want.
I'm with Rob - <selector> may be better and <selectset> is misleading. > You are right, it would be cleaner to drop the "select" part +1 > Is it too late for that kind of a change, though? The whole selector stuff hasn't been documented at all in 1.5beta1, has it? I don't think we must stick to the names we have right now, but should stick to them as soon as we release documentation. Others? > It's fixed in my copy now. You may also want to make sure the example for <contains(select)> doesn't have a literal < in the contains attribute but a < 8-). > Should I resubmit the whole tarball or just the one file? If we want to rename stuff, a new tarball may be the better option. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
