On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:45, Adam Murdoch wrote: > Exposing too much? It's just a couple of utility classes: A SAX > ContentHandler that assembles a ModelElement, and a couple of static > methods.
yep. But thats basically the same as we have over in avalon land wrt DefaultConfigurationBuilder. We started out with a simple version of that but quite a few times we have had to change it and it has been ugly the way we did it (but we needed to do it that way to keep backwards compatability). > That's not to say there shouldn't be a ModelBuilder service, but even if > there were it would not be appropriate for everything. We'd still need > some util stuff somewhere. Maybe on ModelElement itself (the non-SAX > stuff, at least). The clone tree could probably go on the ModelElement. I will stick it on unless you get to it first ;) -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
