On Sun, 26 May 2002, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> 3. Should Xalan be required for bootstrap? >> >> No. IMHO, we should keep the bootstrap requirements to an absolute >> minimum. This needs to be fixed. > > Craeg, Conor - could you let me know what needs to be done to fix > it?
Of course I'm with Conor here 8-) There are currently two classes that make bootstrap depend on TraX, XMLCatalog and XSLTProcess - moving XMLCatalog to types.optional would work, but XSLTProcess is harder to fix. Note that we've carefully avoided all TraX dependencies in <style> by inventing XSLTLogger instead of using ErrorLogger directly. We are not ready to give up the non-trax implementations for <style> yet, so we better don't make <style> depend on it. Taking reflection a step further will probably help 8-). I'll look into this. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
