I'm happy with it. Indeed, if I can get patch to work I'll commit it myself.
as an aside, what version of patch do people use that does work well? I am using patch.exe that comes with wincvs, version 2.5 dated 1997, and it is being petulant. -steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:38 AM Subject: FW: [PATCH] compilerclasspath > Wondering if the coast is clear for this to go into 1.6-a? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PATCH] compilerclasspath > > > Hi, > > I worked with Steve's direction to add a compilerclasspath attribute > to JspC. Currently JspC allows the user to specify a custom compiler, > but forces this compiler to be in the ant classpath. This attribute > allows the custom compiler class to be anywhere. In many cases, the > custom compiler will be part of the project itself, so this is useful. > > The patch includes doc changes, test cases, and the code. Would > someone ci this to head? > > new file src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/DummyAdapter.java > http://apache.org/~keith/DummyAdapter.java.txt > > patches > http://apache.org/~keith/cc.txt and > http://apache.org/~keith/build.txt > > > An unrelated JavaDoc fix: > http://apache.org/~keith/bft.txt > > > Thanks, > Keith > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
