Don't ask me.... I dunno.

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant
RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java


> Conor/Erik,
>
> is there a nightly build we can pick up to test this one?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
> Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
>
>
>
>
> "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 06/10/02 06:35 AM
> Please respond to "Ant Developers List"
>
>
>         To:     "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant
> RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > conor       2002/06/09 03:04:07
> > >
> > >   Modified:    src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH
> > >                         RuntimeConfigurable.java UnknownElement.java
> > >   Log:
> > >   Allow RuntimeConfigurable to be reused
> > >   Do not replace UnknownElements with their actual class so
> redefinitions
> > >   get recreated.
> > >
> >
> > This is a change for a pretty major bug in the current beta. Any
> > redefinition of a task in a taskdef will cause all such tasks to be run
> > without being configured. It is a side effect of the task invalidation
> scheme.
> >
> > Anyway, this change fixes the problem and all test cases pass.
> Nevertheless,
> > as with any change in this area of Ant, it is probably worth being
> > scrutinised by as many eyes as possible. In particular the removal of
> the
> > code which replaces the unknown element with its actual class. I'm not
> sure
> > what other side effects this may cause.
>
> I plan on taking a look at this in the near future, particularly in the
> context of this bug:
>
>     http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7926
>
> I haven't tried it yet - but any thoughts on whether you just fixed that
> in
> the process too?
>
> Nice work, Conor.
>
> Speaking of "future" - what is the time table for future Ant 1.5 betas or
> final release?  I'll take a look at the bug list this coming week to see
> if
> there are any I can address.
>
>     Erik
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to