DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9897>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9897 PropertyFile task - change private members to protected [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-16 06:37 ------- I feel your pain, but dont want to make the changes 1. that backslash escaping? It's in the property file spec. 2. if we made the private stuff protected, we would have to freeze the implementation indefinately; the members would have become part of the public API of ant. 3. why do you need to filter out the escapes? Maybe there is another solution, perhaps one of the new FilterReaders (a characterstripper reader would be a nice generic filter) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
