> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant > Main.ja va Diagnostics.java > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It's really the 1.5 branch with the fixed build.xml (ie manifest) ? > > Yes. I've just removed the <work> tag that refers to build/classes > from the test-ant project and it passes.
mmm.. I don't get it here. Do you by that that beside <work .. build/classes"/> was after the <depend ... dist-ant/> it actually was 'in front' in the classpath ? > > In this case we need a more complex implementation version > > definition that is able to say whether one is compatible with the > > other... > > I agree. Considering the fact that Package includes a isCompatible with method that does this, we might change the specification to include: <major>.<minor>.<micro> and use the implementation version buildXX or something like this. But do we want this to be detected at startup or we don't care but in diagnostic mode ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
