Quoting Diane Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oops -- missed the bit about your not being subscribed to the list the > first time I read your mail. Here's my response. -- Diane
Thanks :) > > > Then, as the complete suffix is supplied, this suffix should be > > > removed instead of relying on a '.' suffix separator. > > > > Well, the idea was (and the doc states) that you don't need to > > specify the ".", since from my perspective, that's what defines > > a suffix. But I suppose if people wanted to specify a "suffix" > > that was, say, _suffix instead of .suffix, then yeah, it'd need > > to get the last index of "suffix" instead of ".". It'd mean > > people would have to include the "." in the 'suffix' attribute, > > though, and that would break it for anyone already relying on it > > being added for them. I suppose I could add a new attribute > > (eg., 'delimiter') that defaults to ".". Or you automagically wipe a '.' that sits just before the removed suffix: 1) remove supplied suffix (as proposed) 2) if value now ends with a '.', wipe it This could be extended to a range of delimiter chars to remove which defaults to ".", enabling to remove any suffix, even when there is no separator between name and suffix (I agree it is a somewhat strange case, but who nows :) PS: I'm still not subscribed, but will be automagically cc:ed if reply is made to all :) -- Lo�c P�ron phone:(33) 683 880 177 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
