On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:49, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:29, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> >> certainly be convenient in cases. Things like <try>-<catch> should
> >> be there IMHO.
> >
> > agreed ... now if Stefan would just lift his veto .... :)
>
> Can we all get out pet scripty tasks in? 8-)
As long as there is no for each or repetition tasks I will be happy :) I have
no problem with selection tasks.
> All or none, we just need to figure out what we want - it would be
> very strange to have an <if> task (myrmidon has?)
yep.
> but no <switch> and
> strongly argue against the later.
Not sure what you mean here - you don't like switch?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
-----------------------------------------------------------
Don't take life too seriously --
you'll never get out of it alive.
-----------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
