> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think it is an overreaction on your side but something that > should be taken into account. > > But then again, I don't think that antlib should download anything and > would leave that to things like JJAR - and of course JJAR should > consider that.
Yes. My point too. No need to reinvent the wheel and the auto download/update stuff might be convenient but this is barely what should be done in real world..usually we stick to a version for some time and upgrade when necessary step by step. So this might be a nice addition in some cases but this IMHO this should be done via a ant/jjar extension. Stephane -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
