> By the same philosophy, why not just move to JDK 1.4? You can > always just set a JVM version target when compiling source, so by not > moving to 1.4 you're merely missing the bug fixes and enhancements.
No - you're preventing people from using the numerous platforms which don't have 1.4 but *do* have 1.3. Note that we're not talking about suggesting that people don't run Ant on 1.4 - we're just talking about not *requiring* them to run 1.4. > Plus, the impression I've always been getting from 1.3.x has > been that its buggier than both 1.2.x and 1.4... could be my imagination > though. Interesting - I've always found 1.3.1 to be more stable than either 1.2.x or 1.4, myself. <shrugs> Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
