At 08:54 AM 7/13/2002 -0700, you wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Peter Donald wrote:
> At 03:01 PM 7/12/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >Not sure I understand what will brake. I'm not talking about putting
> >ant implementation in a separate loader, like tomcat does - just
> >have a small Bootstrap that creates an AntClassLoader and puts
> >everything in lib/ in it ( like the shell is doing ).
>
> The sheel places them in the system classloader and thus a classloader like
>
> new URLClassLoader( new URL[] { myFile.toURL() } );
>
> include the ant classes (as they are in system classloader).
You realize this is wrong and such code will fail in a container
environment. ( as general programming - for ant it may be ok ).
It is not wrong. Thats the way ant was designed to work ;)
Ok, would it be ok if the ant classes ( core, types, standard taskdefs )
are in the system loader, but the optional tasks are not ?
Not for my tasks. They use junit and xslt liasons.
Cheers,
Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
