On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> I don't get it. Why trax ? or why trax only should I say. >>> What do you plan to do when a task depends on say trax AND bsf ? > >>There is no such case, inquire when it happens. 8-) > > May I ask what you have in mind exactly ?
Sure. If people get bitten by <http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/faq.html#delegating-classloader> and want to go the route of removing the TraXLiaison class, they'd only have to move ant-trax.jar out of ANT_HOME/lib and not repackage optional.jar. Once antlibs are there in some way, these split up jars could optionally be used as individual antlibs as well. > As mentioned by Henri, ant-tasks-xxx might be better than 'optional' They may contain types as well (the -bcel.jar would hold classfileset). antlib-xxxx.jar? Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
