On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:35, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesn't matter. > > It may not matter to you. > > > I consider the subject closed, > > So do I, but we do so for different reasons. > > > ant will support targetless build files. > > Yes.
So far I have have vetoed the change and given reasons which other people have supported. You have failed to convince me to lift the veto. Thus under current apache rules the change needs to be reverted. At least thats my understanding of http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html However you and Costin have decided that no vetos count anymore - only majority votes. Because any veto enacts a "revolution" and then that revolution is accepted by majority - thats the reasoning I believe? If so I think this needs to be decided by a far larger community as I don't believe your interpretation is common to the rest of jakarta. If this is your interpretation then I will take it to the general/pmc lists and discuss it there and see if the jakarta rules can be changed. However what I do want for is this be consistent. If one veto is ruled to be invlaid then all vetoes become invalid become invalid. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *------------------------------------------------* | The student who is never required to do what | | he cannot do never does what he can do. | | - John Stuart Mill | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
