I'm +1 on exploring SubVersion - but not for the ant2. What about the optional task collections for a start ? That's a place where we can benefit from a more flexible mechanism.
+1 on starting the ant2 in org.apache.ant, in the main branch, by adding the best ideas out of proposals and the main branch ( with one vote per interface / features and enough discussion on each ) Costin On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jon Skeet wrote: > [1 was hosting Ant2 with SubVersion] > > > My first response was only about (2). As for (1), go for it! Just be > > prepared to have some people watching our dev list, in case anything > > comes up. (And you might as well wait for the Alpha release, of > > course.) > > > > I guess also be prepared for a slightly greater inconvenience to > > contributors. After all, they probably already have CVS clients > > installed on their systems; now you're asking them to install this > > other `svn' thing as well. It's not a huge burden, just something to > > keep in mind. > > Hmm... it could, however, be quite a change for those of us with great CVS > integration in our IDEs. (I don't suppose there's a SubVersion Eclipse > plug-in, is there? :) > > There's also the matter of the rest of jakarta - isn't it *all* done on CVS? > How is SubVersion going to fit in with the other projects? I dare say that > SubVersion is better than CVS in many respects, but keeping with a certain > amount of uniformity has many benefits too. > > -0 on this one. I'd rather not, but I'm certainly not going to try to really > put any roadblocks up. > > +1 for starting an Ant2 repository of *some* description. > > Jon > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
