On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > I can claim that > ... > is cleaner, clearer, easier to understand ... yada yada. > > It follows our current model where work is described by targets and is > requires very little effort to migrate into a fully fledged, well modularised > build file. > > Where I don't think targetless build files do the same. Stephane seems to > agree with me thus my -1 is not invalid.
You -1 is perfectly valid - but it is not a veto, just a negative vote on a majority decision. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
