--- "Patrick (Gus) Heck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would actually advocate that some commiter start a vote so it is > something that was clearly decided rather than something that never > really got considered until too late.
Does it require a committer, or can anyone call for a vote? (I thought it was the latter, but I could be wrong.) > I expect you will vote against it, [...] Exactly, since I see no good reason for it. You've stated the reasons why you think it's a good idea, and I disagree with all of them. It seems like a completely unnecessary restriction to me (unless there are -technical- reasons why it would -need- to be done that way). Diane ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
