Ahhhh, makes sense about the copyright statement. I'll also do the check to make sure the documents have been touched in 2002 to update the copyright (check it against CVS to see when the last commit was done).
I have a patch in bug database http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12195 that fixes the > to be > I thought I'd do these patches in pieces, and put them in the bug database, to make sure it gets attention. Also, I see you patched the ant -help one, there was one mistake in there of a > instead of > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12195 I can submit to you both of these patches as one in an email, and then submit the patch that fixes the rest, like the </>, and a few others, and if you want the <tag /> to be <tag/>, if this is the preferred method. I see quite a mix of both, and <tag/> seems to be the most common. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 5:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] various doc patches > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 5. Updates Copyright to include 2002 if 2001 was the latest year. > > From what I've been told (I'm German, our law is as silly as US > American law, but different ;-) this should only be done to files that > have actually been touched in 2002. > > I'll dig through your patch sometime this week to ensure this is the > case (unless you can provide us with an updated patch in which case I > could commit it a lot faster 8-). > > Thanks for the nice work, BTW. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
