On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:08, Wannheden, Knut wrote:
> I know this topic has been brought up before (e.g. in "Optional tasks"
> thread of last december [1]), but I still wonder what is the actual plan
> for the accepted requirement for Ant2.
I don't think there is any plan for it at this stage. There are too many
potential uses of namespaces and associated confusion. Do you namespace;
* property names
* types (aka tasks, datatypes, condtions, etc)
* property evaluation (ie "${javascript:performMagic()}"
* target names (ie if you depend on foo:bar target will that execute bar
target in foo project?)
* aspects (ie add ant:fail-on-error="true" to all tasks)
That is too confusing for me as a developer. I would pity the user who had to
try and understand a buildfile for that.
> <project xmlns="http://jakarta.apache.org/Ant/v2"
> xmlns:my="urn:my-ant-tasks"
> default="test">
>
> <taskdef qname="my:foo" classname="org.bar.FooTask"/>
> <taskdef name="baz" ns="urn:my-ant-tasks" classname="org.bar.BazTask"/>
>
> <target name="test">
> <echo message="test"/>
> <my:foo/>
> <whatever:baz xmlns:whatever="urn:my-ant-tasks"/>
> </target>
>
> </project>
>
> (Note the two different uses of <taskdef>.)
type aliasing is no problem but I think that is independent of the main issue.
However I think you will find it hard pressed to validate anything without the
runtime context being present. It may be possible but I think that it would
need to be seen to be believed ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
----------------------------------------
"Liberty means responsibility. That is
why most men dread it." - Locke
----------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>