----- Original Message ----- From: "Wannheden, Knut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:20 AM Subject: RE: xml namespace support in ant2
> > > Other than that you still have to decide on a schema > > language to use. I > > > would argue that RELAX NG would be the most suitable for > > this kind of stuff. > > > But I'm not an expert on this, so maybe someone will disagree. > > > > For this, DTD is not usable, Schema is possible, but many agree that > > RELAX NG is the best... if only I knew what it is ;-) one thing erik and I debated when doing the doc fixup was to include some tags about whether attrs were -optional -required -required if some other attr was present/absent -one of a choice allowed I think RNG has much better support for saying 'attr a is allowed only if attr b is absent/present', which makes it good for ant. .... I'll be saying some bad things about Schema at the Portland .net users group (web services section) on october 5, [next to some bad things about WSDL, JAX-RPC, Java support of unsigned datatypes and .NET's lack of support of Soap with Attachments]. All welcome, anyone who anything to do with the design of any of the above extra welcome. www.padnug.org. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
