DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12632>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12632 [PATCH] New <lsync> to synchronize a local directory from one or more <fileset>s ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-16 16:31 ------- So you think it will bubble up my patch queue faster if you do as I say instead of convincing my that your way is correct? ;-) Seriously. If I had written that task, I would have taken an entirely different route (and ended up scanning each directory at least twice instead of once 8-), something that delegates to <copy> and <delete>, each using <present> selectors under the covers. Your approach is superior to that. OK, instead of using Project#createTask (I see you've done what CallTarget does), I'd probably instantiate the subclass directly, call setProject on it and that's it. I'd assume you don't need to set the owning target or the task's name, but I may be wrong in the presence of BuildListeners. Give us a testcase, pretty please 8-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
