Peter Donald wrote:
>> My primary goal is to have a number of features and code adopted >> for the next release of ant. A secondary goal is to have all those >> features available to ant1.5, so people can use them right away. > > Well I am fairly opposed to some of the features you have added and I > don't see them as improvements. I think the best strategy for you to get > something released is to move the code to commons and do a release or two > there. Then you can try to repropose (or not) the features into ant. Well, right now embed is an ant proposal and I see no reason to change that. Each feature will be proposed to a (majority) vote, when I feel it is ready - and if it is accepted I'll move it to head, if not I'll either drop it or continue to work on it as a proposal and address eventual concerns. > It would also be to your advantage to get gump builds working for your > fork. I had myrmidon builds going in parrallel to the main gump build and > then did a diff on the the "scorecard" to see the differences between > myrmidon and main ant tree. The infrastructure is all in gump and I am > sure that Sam/Stefan would be happy to have embed running on at least one > of the boxes each night. I have gump working ( on my own system ), and so far there are no differences. I'll check with Sam about adding them to one of the boxes after I find a clean way to do it ( right now I hacked some files ). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
