DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13847>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13847 pvcs task: wrong option (-r) specified for get (should be -v) ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-25 23:11 ------- No, pvcs does not issue an error, it simply uses whatever parameter was specified last on the command line. A test I did looked like this, where label REVISION_0_0_9 corresponds to file revision 1.2 revision, then label, gets the label: get -r1.0 -vREVISION_0_0_9 "P:\pvcs\develop\dev_db\archives\dev_snewton\SandwichShop"\build.xml_v PVCS Version Manager (get) v6.8.00 (Build 128) for Windows NT/80x86 Copyright 1985-2001 MERANT. All rights reserved. build.xml <- P:\pvcs\develop\dev_db\archives\dev_snewton\SandwichShop\build.xml_v rev 1.2 label, then revision, gets the revision: get -vREVISION_0_0_9 -r1.0 "P:\pvcs\develop\dev_db\archives\dev_snewton\SandwichShop"\build.xml_v PVCS Version Manager (get) v6.8.00 (Build 128) for Windows NT/80x86 Copyright 1985-2001 MERANT. All rights reserved. build.xml <- P:\pvcs\develop\dev_db\archives\dev_snewton\SandwichShop\build.xml_v rev 1.0 In other words, it depends on the order of the parameters! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
