> > So if you post a clear proposal for a resolution to be sent to the > > board, > > Is this what the Ant committers want? If so, I can put one together > for next week (I won't manage to do this earlier, sorry).
I'd certainly like to see a single proposal - I've got a bit lost as to what's being proposed, to be honest. (Partly due to not knowing a lot about Apache's rules/regs in the first place.) > >> Back to the point, I couldn't accept any committer who was not a > >> member of the PMC at the same time with Roy's clarification. > > > > Not sure what that means :-) > > Me neither. > > We've inherited a whole lot of Tomcat committers, who I wouldn't count > as active committers at all. Other than that, it is quite obvious who > has been committing to Ant during the past six months and who has not. > I'm with your definition of "active" to start with, but guess I'd like > to be able to switch emeritus state and regain full access like the > httpd model allows to do (with votes that could deny this, of course). Likewise - as I'm clearly not being active at the moment (sorry folks!) but certainly hope to be in the future. Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
