+1 for general idea On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 00:11, Conor MacNeill wrote: > I have attached a draft resolution below. This is a pretty standard cut and > paste of the recent resolutions passed by the board for other top level > projects. The only issue here I think is to settle on a suitable scope for > the Ant project. The scope I have used in the draft is slightly recursive > in nature so if anyone has any thoughts, let's discuss them.
However for scope I think we should go with Stefans plan and just make the scope ant and not ant-related projects (like gump and friends). We can always have a foundary to link the build tools together. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------ The two secrets to success: 1- Don't tell anyone everything. ------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
