On Tue, 05 Nov 2002, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Why do this?
I have nothing to add to your words - exactly my thoughts. > Scope > > So how about this "the creation and maintenance of open-source > software related to the Apache Ant build tool and supporting task > libraries"? Not sure if that is better - does anyone have any better > words? "closely related"? No need to explicitly mention task libraries, but it may make the intent clearer. "the creation and maintenance of the Apache Ant build tool and closely related open-source software like supporting task libraries"? Sure not enough legaleese in it 8-). > PMC Chair > > We will need to choose a chair for the board resolution. Yes, I think so. > Bylaws > > Here I would expect that we would not have anything peculiar to Ant, > something like Jakarta or httpd would be a good basis. +1 I'd start with httpd myself. > I'd be happy to have a discussion now, to try and capture the > essential elements of the bylaws if there is interest. Thank you for taking the lead on this. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
