Please educate me Stefan. Why Apache BSF? Isn't IBM's BSF good enough? What's wrong with it, except for not being part of Apache? I didn't see an answer for this in the BSF FAQ. I don't really care that much, I'm just wondering. Thanks, --DD
-----Original Message----- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Switching to Apache BSF Hi, now that it is finally there <http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/>, any objections against switching CVS HEAD to using it? There is a 2.3.0 release coming soon, that will support beanshell out of the box (sorry, no list archive available, but here's the relevant commit <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-bsf/src/bsf-2.3/bsf/src/org/apach e/bsf/Languages.properties.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3>) so we can remove our hack. I'm 100% positive Apache BSF 2.3.0 will be released before Ant 1.6. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
