----- Original Message -----
From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> My original Ant 1 patch (which Magesh has cited) used a different approach
> where it tried to guess which underlying method is to be used. I haven't
> studied Magesh's patch in detail but for fully flexibly polymorphism, you
> need to identify the type of the object being passed and the method on the
> task to which you will pass it (i.e. two independent things). Using only
one
> piece of information (the type name) has limits.

Yes.  If the method name to be used is also to be dynamic,
we can make that happen as well - but, I think, going forward
with baby steps will be easier.  If I start packing more and
more into a single patch, the chances of its inner workings
being debated in detail gets slimmer ;-)

> Conor

Cheers,
Magesh



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to