On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, are we all in agreement on delayed construction of tasks ?
I am - if it works 8-) > I would try 2 first, and keep 3 as a backup. I can live with that. > Another option would be to support both 2 and 3 - i.e. have tasks > that execute on read and tasks that execute normally. Since we don't > want to instantiate the task until execution time - marker > interfaces or special methods won't work, but we can use a > properties file with the list of 'exec-on-load' tasks. Uhm, no thanks. That way the result of a build file can not be gathered from the build file alone, you also need to know which additional property file has been read in. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
