Re: Log names ( for c-l ) was: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/listener CommonsLoggingListener.java

[Erik Hatcher]

Costin - it would probably be a good idea to keep the naming 
conventions the same between the raw Log4jListener and the 
CommonsLoggingListener - although Log4JListener has been out for much 
longer and perhaps folks are relying on the category names used by it 
and would be upset for it changing?

Thoughts?
It would be more awkward to have them be different between the two, in 
case someone wants to bump up to the CommonsLoggingListener - or so it 
seems?

Either way, its no big deal to me since I don't really use either on a 
regular basis and the category names are easily changed if we do happen 
to affect them for someone.

        Erik
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 01:59  AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Keep in mind that your previous change, and your proposed changes
break backwards compatibility in case anyone had already set up
filters for Commons Logging, but thats not very likely to be an
issue anyone would complain about.
I agree on both points (it breaks bc and it is no real problem), but
please document it in WHATSNEW.
Oh, no opinion on the names here.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>