On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >>>Didn't understand a thing ;-) >> Me neither 8-) > > > :-)) > > Good, it means that I was right in my supposition.
Not necessarily. I'm focussing on bug fixing and getting 1.5.2 out of the door before I really dive into the stuff originating from the embed proposal. Let's say, I don't understand property-interceptors and why they are needed either 8-) > It's theorically possible to do the same with references, and give > the possibility of having an interceptor to give the reference. IMHO, references and properties should be as similar as possible - note that this broad statement is backed by a total lack of insight into the PropertyHelper thing. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>