J.Pietschmann wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Well said, apart from 4 which I would say "could" instead of "ought to".
I thought you had buy in now that Commons was the place for low level reusable bits if possible? ;)
I'd say yes if there weren't several other places, in particular XML Commons. Many projects also have their own repositories for low level reusable bits, look for example into the excalibur scratchpad...
Xml Commons is possibly a bit overlapping but ATM quite defined.
As for Excalibur, we're removing all low-level reusable bits that are not necessarily Avalon-related... so yes, I agree with Henri, but I don't find it as compulsory as some seem to think.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
