Random thoughts ...
A Committer is considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over four months
I vaguely recall six months 8-). Not that I see any problem in four, just curious why you've changed it.
No real reason - just thought 4 months was sufficient to indicate a lack of interest - can be six without issues for me. httpd is six months - I'll change it.
Do we want to state something like "votes are open for at least 72 hours (a week)"?
I think we can say a week. I don't think such a time limit would apply to a -1 for a code change, however (not suggesting that you do, BTW).
Which kind of vote would require consensus? Adoption of a new codebase as subproject (something the bylaws do not cover yet, not that I think that's bad).
Removal of PMC member or committer requires consensus of all other PMC members. I think this is OK
Adoption of codebase should be majority vote, IMHO, - perhaps 2/3 majority, to ensure project stability. Consensus for that sort of decision is a pretty tall order.
Conor
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
