DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16611>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16611 ant is confused when os.name returns "Windows Server 2003" and tries to exec "command.com" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-31 18:08 ------- yes, we should check for the null string. To probe for win9x we need a list of all OS responses we can get on the win9x product line: '95, '95OSR2, '98, '98se, winME. Is there a listing somewhere? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
